and having sex with pre-pubecent children.. no consent there at all, so to me that's legally wrong and just plain disturbing.
the same for using dead corpses. just too gross not to metion the dieases and stuff that one might get from it.
The pre pubecent children is just legally wrong? No. It's immoral. The child doesn't understand sex. It's a frightening concept and it is damaging. So the law has nothing to do with it there. It's purely what is common sense morality.
My disgust with that and necrophilia have nothing to do with legality. Morality is what drives me here. Necrophiliacs defile a dead body. They have no respect for the person who once was. And the disease part needs not to be mentioned. It's implied.
S&M/B&D are just a little weird. So forgive me if i freak out about it. And also i know someone whose into bondage and is opposed to gays/bisexuals so i'm likely to spaz for no good reason. I'm just not comfortable with sadomasochism and it will take a while to get over all that.
Wanting simulated rape, as Dr. Drew Pinsky has said many times over, is quite often a sign of a traumatic child hood, usualy involving molestation in early years or abusive situations in childhood. the child is then sexually drawn to similar situations in their post adolescence and post pubecent years.
And yes, Dr. Drew is a legit source. He is a legal doctor.
I never said child molestion was only legally wrong, and not immoral. yes, I agree that children doesn't understand sex well enough… that's why they can't even consent fully even if the said children are “groomed” into thinking they really do want it. not to meition, they're not even devloped fully and is pretty much helpless in many ways, so I can't understand the attraction to them…
I think it's pretty immoral to go after somebody or something like that just because they're “easy prey”, and wouldn't fight back as seeing they see most adults as an authority figure meant to be obeyed.
As for nephrohilla… the reason why such a thing disturbs me is because of the whole fact that the person is pretty much like an unconicous person, only expect there's no way that the person will ever “wake up” again. And you don't even know if that dead person would even had constented if that person was alive at that time, you know?
and it's not like there's such a thing as zombies or vampires to back up the fact of an so-called constental dead person.
it's just one person getting his rocks off on an body that won't ever fight back or protest. or even press charages against that offending person.
so again, it's an case of people going after something that won't argue, fight back etc…. they're “easy” to have your way with. pretty much
so for me it's not only a quesiton of legality, it's also a question of morals cocerning costent. personally, I think the people who are into dead people needs to get themselves blow up dolls and leave the dead alone. also prefferiably get themselves some help too.
as for your doctor that says it…. well, he's just ONE doctor. what about other doctors backing up that same belief? I happen to think something is only vaild when it has more than one or two doctors backing it up. that way I know that theory and or study has been tested thoughly and is proven to be true for the majority of people.
I know a couple out there who's into simluated rape, but nethier one of them seems to ever had an tramatic childhood, much less was molested. a lot of people ask them that, and thier answer was always no. in a way it's not even real rape, it's just rough sex for them.
also…there's a few women out there who started out being raped for real, and then ended up enjoying it instead, so the real rape turned into constental sex. and after wards they do the “rape” again, only this time it's simulated. it's very extremely rare, but it can happen.
so I would have to say that not all people who are into simulated rape or something similar are molested young, or even had an traumatic event.