wow, that was just silly.
the plaster comment: more fossils are reconstructed
in plaster, because bones hundreds of thousands of years old are agonizingly fragile and need to be kept very carefully, but also need to be examined throuhly to be sure we're putting it together right, and for display purposes. so someone sees the plaster up in the museum and ignorantly claims that the bones aren't real, thus there was no evolution. weak logic, and little more than an attack on something they don't like.
fossilization: fossilization isn't on a set timetable. it's also used pretty liberally in cases of thing's being preserved by media and the like. it's also used interchangably with petrification by the masses, and well…..that's not always the slowest thing to accomplish
Dinosaurs dying out: there's no population explosion after ther impact (or whatever) for on simple reason. the ENTIRE PLANET WAS EFFECTED. the population would only have exploded if the resources the dinosaurs had were now accesible to other species, and they weren't. they simply weren't there anymore which is why the dinosaurs died out.
it's not like rocks fell from the sky and bashed them all in the head.
Big Bang: the big bang would have likely occurred with all the universe's mass and energy crammed into about the volume of a thumbtack, or thereabouts, which is already beating the laws of physics up and stuffing it inside it's locker. the second law of thermodynamics is nearly impossible to put into perspective to explain it, which is why they've build the large hadron collider. the fact that a crust of bread killed it, and they think it's under attack by the future does a good job of showing how far they're reaching in claiming they understand what they're doing though.
so. religion isn't under attack, it's under counterattack. it shows up, says it knows everything, and when someone has the termenity to prove otherwise, they get defensive because someone's “attacking their beliefs”, and don't want to accept that their beliefs don't actually extend to how things really work. (you don't hear about people questioning muslims, because in the places where they're questioned they tend to kill the doubters. so you hear about them killing people over stupid reasons instead.)
Do some research, ask some questions…..and double check you work against other peoples'. if your opinion is erratic and someone else's in reliable in their results, you need to go over your own work, not shoot the other guy down.