Wow. Heavy stuff. Being a New Yorker and living though 9/11 I don't think we will ever, ever forget. Maybe I'm biased cause I see it every day. I work right at Ground Zero . . . But I can see the Priests' argument. I just disagree. It's already been almost seven years ago that it happened and it's still a huge part of living in the city. I keep waiting for the next shoe to drop cause you just never know. I never suspected anything of the sort to have happened like it did. I guess that's why terrorism is so freaking horrible. It's unexpected, uncalled for and so freaking scary. And 9/11 changed everything. I don't think it will ever be forgotten. But again I might be biased and am open for being enlightened.
All I can say is that if you don't like his morality judging from this interview then you are really going to hate the guy as the story progresses!
In essence, HIS point is that Great Britain did so much damage to Irish people and that fact shouldn't be forgotten. He compares it to 911 and says that equally that shouldn't be forgotten.
However, I disagree with him. I don't think violence is the way to do anything.
Sadly, I agree with you Tommie. There [i]are[/i] monsters who will use violence to support any cause. But only the naive or people who are equally monstrous will defend their right to use it, especially against innocents. In that sense, I don't see her questions as condescending. Like any good reporter, she is quite rightly calling him on the immorality of his position.
The fact that he seeks to draw a comparison with 9/11 shows the extent to which he is deluding himself and she is right. The 9/11 hijackers were guilty of mass murder which makes them the same as the IRA. For him to paint one as worthy of condemnation while defending the other is just a reaffirmation of his own prejudice. I'm afraid I'm with the reporter on this one!
;-)
DAJB:
True, but everyone has a blinkered view of the world. It's the only way it can be, everyone sees it from their own angle and beliefs.
It was a low blow, maybe, to mention 911, but she was being quite dismissive and condescending him.
Sadly, I reckon that people will always use force to get what they believe is right.
This guy has serious morality problems, especially for a priest! "Do you think 911 will still be relevant in 100 years?" Sure, but that's not the real question. "Do you think it will still be okay to fund groups that murder innocent men, women and children just for your own political beliefs?" is a better one. This guy has such an blinkered view of the rewal world, it's hardly surprising that Adams and co. could find supporters among people like him!
sethteter at 7:07PM, May 4, 2008
Wow. Heavy stuff. Being a New Yorker and living though 9/11 I don't think we will ever, ever forget. Maybe I'm biased cause I see it every day. I work right at Ground Zero . . . But I can see the Priests' argument. I just disagree. It's already been almost seven years ago that it happened and it's still a huge part of living in the city. I keep waiting for the next shoe to drop cause you just never know. I never suspected anything of the sort to have happened like it did. I guess that's why terrorism is so freaking horrible. It's unexpected, uncalled for and so freaking scary. And 9/11 changed everything. I don't think it will ever be forgotten. But again I might be biased and am open for being enlightened.
Tommie Kelly at 2:49AM, May 3, 2008
All I can say is that if you don't like his morality judging from this interview then you are really going to hate the guy as the story progresses! In essence, HIS point is that Great Britain did so much damage to Irish people and that fact shouldn't be forgotten. He compares it to 911 and says that equally that shouldn't be forgotten. However, I disagree with him. I don't think violence is the way to do anything.
DAJB at 1:05PM, May 2, 2008
Sadly, I agree with you Tommie. There [i]are[/i] monsters who will use violence to support any cause. But only the naive or people who are equally monstrous will defend their right to use it, especially against innocents. In that sense, I don't see her questions as condescending. Like any good reporter, she is quite rightly calling him on the immorality of his position. The fact that he seeks to draw a comparison with 9/11 shows the extent to which he is deluding himself and she is right. The 9/11 hijackers were guilty of mass murder which makes them the same as the IRA. For him to paint one as worthy of condemnation while defending the other is just a reaffirmation of his own prejudice. I'm afraid I'm with the reporter on this one! ;-)
Tommie Kelly at 12:01PM, May 2, 2008
DAJB: True, but everyone has a blinkered view of the world. It's the only way it can be, everyone sees it from their own angle and beliefs. It was a low blow, maybe, to mention 911, but she was being quite dismissive and condescending him. Sadly, I reckon that people will always use force to get what they believe is right.
DAJB at 10:54AM, May 2, 2008
This guy has serious morality problems, especially for a priest! "Do you think 911 will still be relevant in 100 years?" Sure, but that's not the real question. "Do you think it will still be okay to fund groups that murder innocent men, women and children just for your own political beliefs?" is a better one. This guy has such an blinkered view of the rewal world, it's hardly surprising that Adams and co. could find supporters among people like him!
amanda at 7:47AM, May 2, 2008
He *does* make an excellent point. Forgiving people is not the same as forgetting. Gah, now I have that JFK quote stuck in my head.
cs3ink at 7:44AM, May 2, 2008
I can feel the tension boiling beneath the facade. Masterfully well done!
TheMidge28 at 7:34AM, May 2, 2008
good points in deed... but at what price?
shaneronzio at 7:02AM, May 2, 2008
Good Answer Awesome that he still shows support for the Irish Republican Army.
Peipei at 1:47AM, May 2, 2008
Gah! Republicans always send chills down my spine :X...heh.