
I ran into this image and well.
it's right.
the more skin an image shows the more armor / protection you get.. right?
mlaiThe difference between this and Conan, I think, is that in Conan both the male and female warriors are under-dressed. It's a primitive world in which strength and ease of movement is more important than constrictive armour. For everyone.
I wonder when this fetish trend started… probably Conan?
alejkhan
Another important factor to consider, is that minimal armor will mean more freedom of movement. (*Tries to rationalize the naked bits……..) No fantasy thief/archer elf thing is going to wear full on armor while they try to stealthily steal those items you've so rightfully collected from your fallen foes.
mlai
Spartans wore armor. Not just on their heads.
Sidwarriousmlai
Spartans wore armor. Not just on their heads.
So basically to mlai if a codpiece is big enough it counts as armor. I didn't know codpiece was a word. Awesome.
Sidwarrious
Me and my friend had a joke about Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance that the more important the character the bigger the shoulder pad. I don't really know who you're talking about though. I'm kinda ignorant on it. Maybe Cloud from FF7?
Inkmonkey
Back to the topic; how often are these “un-armors” justified by the creator saying that they're “magical”? And painfuly non-functional armor isn't limited to female warriors in fantasy paintings. The 90's-era comicbook heroes had an odd habit of having just one really big shoulder pad… and the rest of their outfit is just spandex and a shitload of pouches.
Someone
But armored…OH! Uh The girl in Suikoden 3! Priscella? Can't remember her name though. But she wears full armor!
mlai
I don't think full armor counts when it's in prose form. Nobody can see the metal bikini anyways, so you might as well be authentic.
marine
Your armor doesn't have enough pouches to hold things.
I
I have a gun. It's really powerful. Especially against living things.