El Cid wrote:Sounds good. This one it is then:
the second one's simpler. So… for a banner… I guess the second one?

http://media.drunkduck.com/users/plymayer/assets/users_Xup_assets_250x2.png
El Cid wrote:Sounds good. This one it is then:
the second one's simpler. So… for a banner… I guess the second one?
arteestx wrote:interesting, dunno this comic…
Thanks for doing this El Cid, here's one from me….
SquallLion wrote:
interesting, dunno this comic…
hey, you forgot the link!
darrellsan wrote:Heh, thanks for having me Darrelsan! So, I whipped up a couple for consideration, and for a hoot, I tried making an animated version - hope folk like'm!
We ought to add/invite Rampant404 who doesthe excellent Tales of Schlock
http://www.theduckwebcomics.com/Tales_of_Schlock/
El Cid wrote:Thanks El Cid! And those are just thumbs for the post - clicking on one will bring up the full size banner. Sorry for the confusion!
They all look great! You should pick one and maybe make it a little bigger (remember you can go up to 150 width). I can barely read the text!
Granted, my eyesight's not so great, though!
Prototype wrote:Agree. Two reasons: First, banners should be tease to get someone to click, beats the purpose if you show everything from the get-go; second, not all our readers may appreciate seeing stuff they don't normally feel comfortable with…
…
I would prefer if the banners have mild nudity/be somewhat tasteful rather than going all out and poke me in the face with steamy body parts or decapitated heads. Not that I'm prude, but it just feels like if it is TOO explicit it takes away the focus from the comic I'm on.
…