Product Placement
Evidence against Product Placement: Grinning avatar. Having ties to the narration based on an old narration.
Evidence against Crocty: Grinning avatar. Having ties to the narration based on an old narration.
Yeah. I can see why my evidences are so much more compelling.
Why don't you just say it as it is. You're voting for me to save your own ass, just like I'm doing. I know I'm innocent and I can see you're saying your innocent. But then again everyone always says they're innocent so it's your words against mine.
Okay so I guess no one listened at all when I said that that wasn't a clue. Because I asked Niccea to make sure what clues are based off. (Avatars, Signautres, Profiles, Thumbnails, First 10 pages of comics)
I also guess no one listened when I said that the helmet on the Fractions thumbnail (Thumbnails count towards clues, just in case you didn't hear me say that) or when I posted a link to Oh gawd (Comics count) which had a huge star wars logo on it.
Sure they're different narratives, but it's better than the one clue against me, which also applies to two others.
Dunno why I'm bothering though, everyone will ignore this and continue to say that there's only one suspect, because there's no clues pointing to anyone but me.